long time I was away ... the excuse is the same as always: great hits, shortly. But now I return to this dimension, I find some blogs that have given space to debate, because the next election. Sounds good, I like to argue about the future of our country.
In this regard, I would like to refer to a file that is circulating on the Internet and disqualify the candidate of the Concertación, Michelle Bachelet. I hope that if any of you get it, do not distribute it further, because it will be complicit to spread lies, garbage and phrases without argument.
I understand and agree that everyone is different, therefore, think differently and chose what is more suited to our way of seeing life. But that does not mean that disqualify it does not fit our concepts or criticize without arguments.
In the file mentioned, states that Bachelet can not become President because he has not led an exemplary life since "has had many partners, has children from different fathers and atheist. " I do not know who on earth has a life "Exemplary." Will Mr. Piñera, Lavin and Hirsch have it? "They themselves are an example? What is about the fact that he is an atheist? Personally, I declare myself Catholic and try to live my life according to Christian values \u200b\u200bthat have taught me, but I know people who are atheists and very good people, respectful of the value of life, believe in love and try to make this a better world. Faced with this "argument", two things: Pinochet is a believer, Sunday Mass and still did much damage to our country. I do not care if the next President is either non-believer, I do not care who is a person able to solve the problems we all know that exist.
After declaring that she is in favor of abortion, gay marriage and legalization of marijuana, and absolutely false statements showing that the person who made this file, is a completely ignorant, you do not even read the newspaper or watch the news or simply want to tarnish the image of this woman based on lies.
Finally, a summary saying that Bachelet "is not reliable for the other parties of its cluster, it is spiteful" and "no emotional stability because she has no husband or stable relationship." Where do they get these claims? How long a person needs to have a partner to be emotionally stable? I do not think you need to say more.
I'll end this post with a paragraph from an email he wrote my brother, because of this same file: "Okay worry about who will lead the country the next years, is well review, discuss, campaign, trying to convince people to vote for someone else, in other words, is good politics, we are all free to do so, but you have to exercise that right with a certain criterion, high-mindedness, with sound and unbiased judgments. Argue about their abilities and shortcomings, about its history, its achievements and failures, we are in the right (and duty) to do, but not if married or separated, or if you are a believer or atheist and less about the 'moral' .
I should add that both my brother and I are not going to vote for it, but we believe this is not the way to build the Chile we want.
0 comments:
Post a Comment